The real intention of NATO

As the Libyan opposition struggles to take full control of the country, all eyes are now on the ?Friends of Libya? conference in Paris, where delegates from 60 countries, many with various vested interests, will congregate.

Even while the dust has yet to settle, the haste with which companies from NATO countries are scrambling to grab a share of the dividends of war has caused many to question the true intentions of the military intervention in Libya.

Just days after the capture of the Bab al-Azizya compound in Tripoli officials of major European countries were reportedly lining up for talks with the fledgling National Transitional Council to secure lucrative contracts.

?What matters now is the speed,? said Antonio De Capoa, chairman of the Italian-Libyan Chamber of Commerce, representing Italian companies eager to return to invest in the country as soon as possible.

British companies are complaining that their French, Italian and German rivals have ?stolen a march on Britain? in winning multi-billion-pound contracts in Libya.

] But Chris Sanderson, the director for Control Risks leading business support in Libya, said there are still opportunities for British companies in infrastructure, civil security, oil and gas as well as banking, finance and telecommunications.

?There is clearly an opportunity for UK business to seek to recover commercially some measure of the UK’s significant diplomatic and military investment,? he said.

But no one has been as straightforward as France’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Alain Juppe, who said, ?When I am asked about the cost of the operation the ministry of defense speaks of a million euros per day ? I point out that it is also an investment in the future.?

From multinational oil conglomerates to smaller companies in these NATO countries, war-torn Libya is simply a golden opportunity for profit.

But for the Libyan people the first priority is for life to return to normal.

What they need is political and social stability, not foreign companies fighting over ?lucrative contracts.?

Libya is an independent nation-state as well as a member of the UN and Libya’s future belongs to its people.

Therefore, the U.N., whose Security Council adopted Resolution 1973 on Libya in March, has the responsibility to take a leading role in the rebuilding process.

It is good to hear that the U.N. has prepared a plan for bringing an integrated, politically led mission to Libya and its first aim is to get U.N. personnel on the ground as quickly as possible, under a robust Security Council mandate.

It should coordinate international efforts in providing humanitarian aid and other support necessary to the Libyan people, while guaranteeing Libya against any foreign interference in its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

After the six-month bloodbath, it’s time for Libya to restore its stability and put a legitimate and inclusive government in place that is fully recognized by the international community.

This entry was posted in Berita / News and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.